historical-analogy

Foreign Affairs 2026-10-22-2

Empires of AI: The Rise and Fall of a New Global Order

The Empires of AI piece argues that scaling laws tie the frontier to energy, chips and capital, so capital decides who can keep racing. The US paid about $881B in interest against $874B on defense in 2024, while the biggest tech firms committed more than $600B of 2026 capex. Add the June Commerce order that took Anthropic's top two models dark worldwide, and access to the output of those scarce tools looks like a revocable state concession.

# tags

ai-geopolitics ai-capital-cycle export-controls china-ai sovereign-ai taiwan-risk guns-and-butter historical-analogy world-order open-models scaling-laws national-security compute-scarcity tsmc foreign-affairs

◆ entities

National security Fiscal dominance AI capex cycle Geopolitical Risk Supply Constraint Economics

→ threads

ai-capital-cycle compute-scarcity

⟷ links

2026-03-13-w3 2026-04-12-1 2026-04-03-2 2026-05-18-1 2026-03-18-1 2026-05-09-w1 2026-10-21-3 2026-03-11-2 2026-03-18-3 2026-10-16-1 2026-10-16-w2

permalink

Capital Gains (The Diff) 2026-05-06-2

Bubbles Don't Pop All At Once

Hobart's AI bubble piece is the first to get the mechanism right, not just the outcome: inference floors at electricity, not zero, so the fiber collapse cannot replay. The actual risk is thesis drift. When applications cool, capital flees to picks-and-shovels infrastructure, and that infrastructure ends up funded by the same venture dollars that evaporate. Amazon grew 0.2% YoY in Q3 2001; the supposedly safe trade killed people. Oracle's counterparty-stretching debt and neocloud vendor financing suggest the 'datacenter investors are more serious this time' claim is true on average and wrong in the tail.

# tags

ai-bubble ai-capex-cycle inference-economics neocloud historical-analogy private-credit-risk ai-infrastructure-finance ai-capex ai-infrastructure bubble-risk ai-economics narrative-analysis consensus-migration byrne-hobart the-diff capital-gains

Albert Bridge Capital 2026-05-04-1

'Til Death Do Us Part

Drew Dickson stacks four cycles (1840s UK railroads, 1870s US railroads, 1920s RCA, 1990s internet) and the drawdown receipts are unimpeachable: RCA -98% in three years, Cisco -90%, Amazon -95%, the entire Nasdaq -78%. The fresher data point is structural, not historical: the VanEck Semiconductor ETF moves $3B a day in flows, equal to the entire daily volume of the French stock market. The actionable read is not bull-versus-bear; it is that operational AI capability and AI equity prices are about to decouple for 12-24 months, and the buy list worth writing today is the application-layer companies positioned to inherit stranded compute at 20 cents on the dollar in 2029.

# tags

ai-bubble valuation behavioral-finance historical-analogy ai-capex-cycle market-volatility ai-economics fundamentals narrative-capex-feedback bubble-risk ai-1.0-defensibility albert-bridge-capital drew-dickson etf-flows capital-formation

Wall Street Journal 2026-05-03-2

What the 1920s Can Teach Us About Surviving the AI Revolution

The 1920s analogy has reached WSJ-anniversary-feature status: late-cycle consensus comfort framing. The half everyone leans on (spillover jobs, society absorbs) is the structurally weakest part of the analog; electrification reached 68 percent of US homes by 1930, but TFP gains showed up 1948-1973. If that lag is the right template, current AI public-market multiples are pricing 1925-style payback for a 1955 timeline: patient-capital infrastructure thesis stays intact, application-layer SaaS multiple expansion does not.

# tags

ai-economics ai-adoption-patterns narrative-analysis ai-political-economy ai-policy ai-regulation pilot-to-scale wsj ai-labor-displacement skill-revaluation ai-and-human-capacity historical-analogy