AI, three at a time · read · watch · listen

Tag

superintelligence

4 reads

Freddie deBoer (Substack) 2026-10-21-1

Four Direct, Reasonable, and Important AI Questions (Which the AI People Will Ignore)

deBoer holds AI maximalists to their own yardstick and finds daily life in 2026 barely distinguishable from 2021. His best argument is that cancer is limited by tumor recurrence, toxicity and patient dropout, and curing every cancer would add only about three years of life expectancy. That sets the ceiling for Schmidt's claim that disease could be cured in 15-20 years: where the constraint is physical, faster thinking buys little.

In Good Company with Nicolai Tangen 2026-10-21-2

Eric Schmidt: The Age of Agents, Superintelligence, and Why Europe Is Falling Behind

Schmidt says the gains are real but concentrated in software, cyber and math, where learning loops are fast, and biology lags on data. The effect he is most confident about is organizational: a friend's firm cut 20% of staff, the 'glue' planners, and an estimated 2,000 of 10,000 people at a large firm are unneeded. Read against deBoer's cancer example, displacement arrives first where the work is coordination, not where the problem is physical.

BG2Pod · 2026-10-16 2026-10-16-w2

BG2Pod with Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley — Jensen Huang | Does AI Revenue Justify Capex, '27 AI Bottlenecks, Singularity, Open vs Closed & more

Jensen's claim that the moat is growing rests on a buyer's logic: a $50-100B order can't be benchmarked, so it gets underwritten on fungibility, durability and rentability. Nvidia's content per gigawatt has gone from about $18B to 40-plus B, and about a third of the business is startups renting compute, so payback does not hinge on two labs reaching trillion-dollar revenue. SemiAnalysis expects 43 GW of new AI compute next year, against a Street view of 35-40 GW of land, power and shell that may come online. That is the lender's checklist, and it explains why a guarantee book exists at all. What it adds to the week is the demand side of the financing: the AI-bubble question now sits with the non-lab two-thirds and how fast power gets energized.

BG2Pod 2026-10-16-1

BG2Pod with Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley — Jensen Huang | Does AI Revenue Justify Capex, '27 AI Bottlenecks, Singularity, Open vs Closed & more

Jensen argues the moat is growing because a $50-100B order can't be benchmarked, so buyers underwrite it on fungibility, durability and rentability. Nvidia's content per gigawatt has climbed from about $18B to 40-plus B, and roughly a third of the business is startups renting compute. That is the lender's checklist, and it explains why Hoffman's guarantee book exists at all.